No-Code Agentist
A daily digest of practical AI agent workflows for non-developers. We isolate actionable no-code guides from viral hype. Scored against human-defined standards.
Daily Summary
5 curated | 8 evaluatedNo-code agent builders are shifting from chatbots to autonomous systems that execute multi-step workflows while users focus elsewhere, as demonstrated by and combining dozens of plugins for end-to-end task automation. Meanwhile, Anthropic's new for Claude Managed Agents marks a fundamental change in how AI inference is billed, and emerging tools like Hermes Agent are rapidly gaining adoption despite .
No es un chatbot que responde preguntas. Es un agente que vive en tu ordenador y ejecuta tareas mientras tú haces otra cosa. En este ejemplo👇 Generé 3 agentes independientes, uno encargado de mis facturas, otro de la gestión de los cobros y otro de la creación de contenido. (FACTURACIÓN-COBROS-CONTENIDO) Son capaces de trabajar sin abrir ninguna app. Sin estar delante. Enlaces a los Agentes que he creado: https://t.co/zpasJ9H1Lz https://t.co/sIkBuSdvHs https://t.co/281SSPMu5t
「AI秘書」の構築資料が有益。 Codeと90個の公式プラグインを組み合わせ、朝のIssueトリアージから夕方のSlack要約までを自動化する「AI秘書」の構築手順を余すことなく徹底公開。 こちら👉 https://t.co/Le7uyyioh6
🔻 No-code agent creation Build and deploy AI agents without writing a single line of code... just describe your goal. 🔻 Multi-agent orchestration Agents coordinate in complex workflows together, not one-off scripts. Spaghetti logic is replaced by modular, reusable intelligence. 🔻 On-chain settlement Agents carry wallets and execute transactions. They can trade assets or pay for services directly on the blockchain. Every trade or payment is final and verifiable... no hidden fees or off-platform accounting. 🔻 Agent economy Kodeus turns each contribution into a revenue stream. As Sooryah Pokkali (CBO) explains, “Platforms scale with users; ecosystems scale with owners.” On Kodeus, build an agent -> earn when others use it; create a plugin -> earn on each invocation. All rewards flow in native $KODE tokens, making intelligent automation self-sustaining.
Hermes Agent just overtook Claude Code in GitHub stars. It's already ahead of Codex. Yet people are still sleeping on it. If you work or tinker with AI and you haven't tried it yet, you owe it to yourself to try it. It's not going to take you a long time to set up. 5-15 mins max and another 30-45 mins testing it. Do so will dispel your doubts. It doesn't take long to form your own judgement of whether it's hype or substance. You'll be surprised. I was asking a friend who uses lots of Claude Code why he didn't try it yet. He said it's because it'll take him a long time to get it properly set up. NOPE. It's not true. This is not some IDE, Claw or CLI that takes a long time to get up and running. Once you have your tokens flowing, just start chatting and pointing it at things you need to get done. You'll be surprised. If you decide to stick with it, follow my quick post on how to make it even better. Takes another 10-15 mins and you really only need it if you commit to it. https://t.co/EWeSKhRo0I Try it. Don't be left behind.
Anthropic confirmed Claude Managed Agents pricing this week. Session runtime is $0.08 per session-hour, billed to the millisecond. Only running time counts. Idle time is free. Token costs continue at standard rates. For Opus 4.6 that is $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output tokens. Web search inside a session is $10 per 1,000. Anthropic's worked example puts a one hour coding session at $0.705 total. The Code Execution container hour billing folds into session runtime. The pricing news is not the dollar number. The pricing news is the unit. For two and a half years, AI inference has been priced on tokens. A token measures the input or output piece of text the model processes. Every API call has a token meter on it. Every commercial integration is built around token cost as the variable line item. That is the unit of compute consumed per query. Session runtime is a different unit. A session is the agent residency held open against a user's intent. A coding agent that takes one hour to ship a pull request consumes session runtime for the full hour, even when it is reading documentation, navigating files, or waiting on a tool. The token meter on that same session captures the inference cost. The two units price two different things. Tokens price compute. Sessions price persistence. This matters because agentic AI does not match the token billing model cleanly. An agent that does the work of a knowledge worker does not consume tokens at a constant rate. It consumes them in bursts, with long stretches of orchestration, planning, and waiting. Token pricing alone underprices the cost of holding the agent open. Session pricing prices the cost of the agent being available to the workflow. The two together price the actual unit of work the agent performs. The first principles read is that the pricing primitive for agentic AI just moved one layer up the stack. From the inference call to the work session. From compute consumed to time the agent is the responsible party for a workflow. This is a small word change that has large procurement implications.